body,date,page,text,path
CityCouncil,2005-04-07,1,"MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING
THURSDAY- - -APRIL 7, 2005- - -4:00 P.M.
Mayor Johnson convened the Special Meeting at 4:10 p.m.
Roll Call - Present : Councilmembers Daysog, deHaan, Gilmore,
Matarrese, and Mayor Johnson - 5.
Absent :
None.
The Special Meeting was adjourned to Closed Session to consider :
(05-155) - Public Employment - Title: City Manager.
Following the Closed Session, the Special Meeting was reconvened
and Mayor Johnson announced that no decision was made.
Adjournment
There being no further business, Mayor Johnson adjourned the
Special Meeting at 8:10 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Lara Weisiger
City Clerk
The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown
Act.
Special Meeting
Alameda City Council
April 7, 2005",CityCouncil/2005-04-07.pdf
CivilServiceBoard,2005-04-07,1,"ORATED
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING
OF THE
CIVIL SERVICE BOARD OF THE CITY OF ALAMEDA
THURSDAY, APRIL 7, 2005
1.
Meeting called to order at 5:07 p.m.
2.
ROLL CALL: Members NakMin Oddie, Michael Rich, Michael Robles-Wong, Roberto Rocha, and
Executive Secretary Karen Willis. Member William J. Smith arrived at 5:12 p.m., during which time the
Board had moved past the Consent Calendar acceptance, and was on to item 6 on the agenda.
ABSENT:
None.
STAFF PRESENT: Terri Highsmith, Assistant City Attorney, and Marsha Merrick, Executive
Assistant, Human Resources.
3.
MINUTES:
The Minutes of the Regular Meeting of January 5, 2005, were reviewed; Member Oddie
made a motion to accept, seconded by Member Rich, and carried by a 3-0 vote. Member Rocha abstained,
as he was not present at the January 2005 meeting. Member Rocha, however, thanked the board for
adjourning that meeting in memory of his mother, who had passed away closely preceding the January
2005 meeting.
4.
CONSENT CALENDAR: Member Rocha made a motion to accept the Consent Calendar as presented,
seconded by Member Rich, and carried by a 4-0 vote.
SUMMARY REPORT FOR EXAMINATION ELIGIBLE LISTS AND CLASSIFICATIONS FOR THE
MONTHS OF JANUARY, FEBRUARY AND MARCH 2005:
4-A
ELIGIBLE LISTS ESTABLISHED:
DATE ESTABLISHED
Assistant Engineer
01/03/05
Buyer
01/13/05
Combined Building Inspector
03/10/05
Development Manager
01/18/05
Financial Analyst
01/26/05
Office Assistant
01/11/05
Planner III
01/20/05
Reconstruction Specialist Il (Promotional)
03/03/05
Senior Construction Inspector
01/18/05
Street Light Maintenance Technician
03/05/05
System Dispatcher
03/24/05
""Dedicated to Excellence, Committed to Service""",CivilServiceBoard/2005-04-07.pdf
CivilServiceBoard,2005-04-07,2,"City of Alameda
Page 2
Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the Civil Service Board
Thursday, April 7, 2005
4-B
ELIGIBLE LISTS EXTENDED:
DATE ESTABLISHED
Code Compliance Officer
08/26/03
Distribution Engineer
09/03/03
Fire/Building Code Compliance Officer
09/21/04
Maintenance Worker Il
09/02/04
Police Lieutenant (Promotional)
07/09/03
Police Sergeant (Promotional)
09/15/04
Program Specialist Il (Clean Water Program)
09/30/03
Public Works Supervisor
08/17/04
Senior Electrical Engineer
08/19/04
Traffic Signal Maintenance Technician
09/29/03
4-C
ELIGIBLE LISTS EXPIREDICANCELLED:
DATE ESTABLISHED
Administrative Services Coordinator
07/07/04
Administrative Technician I (Promotional)
08/04/04
Business Development Manager
07/12/04
Construction Inspector
03/11/03
Development Manager - Housing
03/13/03
Management Analyst (Base Reuse and Redevelopment)
08/27/04
Management Analyst (Community Programs)
09/30/04
Management Analyst (Small Business Assistance)
09/17/04
Program Specialist Il (Community Programs)
07/22/04
Senior Clerk
09/03/03
Senior Utility Analyst
09/09/04
Supervising Librarian
07/09/04
4-D
LIST OF SPECIFICATIONS:
Deputy City Attorney I
Police Officer - Recruit
5.
REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS
The Activity Report for the period of December 1, 2004 - February 28, 2005 was reviewed.
6.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA (PUBLIC COMMENT)
None
7.
CIVIL SERVICE BOARD COMMUNICATIONS (COMMUNICATIONS FROM BOARD)
None
8.
CIVIL SERVICE BOARD COMMUNICATIONS (COMMUNICATIONS FROM STAFF)
Terri Highsmith, Assistant City Attorney, was in attendance to respond to questions
regarding the Civil Service Board's role in making recommendations to the City Council for
changes in Civil Service System policies. She began by describing what is contained in the
City Charter, and how there is a ""bright line"" that separates the Boards responsibilities, from
""Dedicated to Excellence, Committed to Service""",CivilServiceBoard/2005-04-07.pdf
CivilServiceBoard,2005-04-07,3,"City of Alameda
Page 3
Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the Civil Service Board
Thursday, April 7, 2005
those of the City Manager and his staff.
The Board is charged with the making of policy and procedure. The City Manager and his
staff have authority over the implementation and operations of these policies and
procedures. Assistant City Attorney Highsmith spent some time breaking this down for the
members, and responding to the questions posed surrounding limitations of authority. The
Board and staff give their thanks to Ms. Highsmith for her direction.
While Assistant City Attorney Highsmith was present, a question came up on the proper
procedure for agendizing items for future meetings. Ms. Highsmith advised that Executive
Secretary Willis was their liaison in this matter, and she would be the one to set the agenda,
including items of interest to the Board members. Member Smith stated his preference to
make his requests through Chair Robles-Wong, who would then work through Ms. Willis,
and it was agreed that this was a perfectly acceptable alternative.
In light of this, two requests were made to agendize items for the upcoming July 2005
meeting. Chair Robles-Wong requested that a discussion be held regarding Rule of the List
and adjusting the language in the Civil Service Rules. Member Rich requested to see EEO-
4 gender and ethnicity data to further a discussion initiated by Member Smith regarding
workforce diversity and its impact on community relations. Member Rich also suggested
that the City's anti-discrimination policy might be amended to include a commitment to
recruitment outreach as a good faith effort to promote workforce diversity. Accordingly,
Member Robles-Wong requested that the anti-discrimination policy be agendized for the
next meeting.
Revised language under Civil Service Rules, Article VII. Section 1 Establishment of Lists, to
add National Guard members to our definition of veterans for preference point purposes,
was presented to the Board for their approval. Member Rocha made a motion to accept,
Member Smith seconded, and the item was carried by a 5-0 vote. Staff will move forward
with a formal revision and re-distribution of the Rules.
9.
ADJOURNMENT:
Chair Robles-Wong asked for a motion to adjourn, which was provided by Member Smith,
Member Rocha seconded, and carried by a 5-0 vote. There being no further business to come
before the Board, the meeting was adjourned at 6:07 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Karen Willis
Human Resources Director &
Executive Secretary to the Civil Service Board
""Dedicated to Excellence, Committed to Service""",CivilServiceBoard/2005-04-07.pdf
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard,2005-04-07,1,"MINUTES OF HISTORICAL ADVISORY BOARD
REGULAR MEETING OF THURSDAY, APRIL 7, 2005
COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL
2263 SANTA CLARA AVENUE - 7:00 PM
Vice Chair Anderson called the meeting to order at 7:10 pm. Secretary Altschuler
called the roll.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Boardmembers Lynch, Miller & Tilos.
MEMBERS ABSENT:
Chair McPherson, Vice-Chair Anderson.
STAFF PRESENT:
Secretary Altschuler, Recording Secretary Debbie
Gremminger.
MINUTES:
M/S (Lynch, Miller) to continue the minutes of the Special meeting of March 10, 2005 due to
lack of quorum. 3-0-2.
Ayes: 3;
Noes: 0; Absent: 2; Motion carries.
AGENDA CHANGES AND DISCUSSIONS:
Staff requested that Item 4 be heard 1st prior to items 1, 7 2, & 3.
M/S (Lynch, Miller) to hear Item 4 first. 3-0-2.
Ayes:
3;
Noes: 0; Absent: 2; Motion carries.
WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS: (Discussion only)
Secretary Altschuler informed the Board of the Historical Preservation Conference in
Riverside.
ACTIONITEMS (Discussion/Action)
4. Transportation Master Plan Policies - Review and comment on the draft TMP policies,
and recommend a set of final draft policies to the City Council for approval.
Barry Bergman, Public Works Department, stated that in 2004, the City Council approved
the development of a citywide Transportation Master Plan
Minutes of April 7, 2005
Regular Historical Advisory Board Meeting
1",HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2005-04-07.pdf
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard,2005-04-07,2,"The TMP will consist of six individual plans: 1) multimodal circulation, 2) motor vehicle, 3)
transit, 4) bicycle, 5) pedestrian, and 6) transportation system management/ transportation
demand management.
A subcommittee was established to oversee the development of circulation policies for the
TMP These polices were to address all transportation modes on a general level, while
policies for the mode-specific plans (e.g. the bicycle plan and transit plan) will include more
detail.
Staff would like the Board to review the Draft Policies and give comments, and recommend a
set of final draft policies to the City Council for approval.
The Draft Policies were not included in the packet. Staff will forward a copy of this
document to the Board and they can submit their comments via e-mail.
1. Adoption of Resolution Commending Judith Altschuler, Secretary for the Historical
Advisory Board, for her Contributions to the City of Alameda.
Debbie Gremminger, Recording Secretary, read the Resolution and presented it to Ms.
Altschuler.
Board member Tilos opened the floor to public comment.
Scott Brady, former president of HAB, would like to thank Judith for all of her time and
effort she has put in over the time of his tenure on the Board. Mr. Brady feels they got a lot
of things accomplished in terms of advancing preservation here in Alameda. And Judith did
a lot of the behind the scenes work. We have very good amendments to our Preservation
Ordinance largely due to her efforts.
Rosemary McNally, would like to encourage the Board to pass this resolution.
Board member Tilos closed the floor to public comment and opcned Board discussion.
Board member Tilos would also like to thank Judith for her work on this Board. She has
been very helpful.
M/S (Miller/Lynch) to approve the Resolution as presented. 3-0-2.
Ayes: 3;
Noes:
0;
Absent: 2; Motion carries.
Ms. Altschuler thanked the Board and the members of the community.
Minutes of April 7, 2005
Regular Historical Advisory Board Meeting
2",HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2005-04-07.pdf
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard,2005-04-07,3,"2. Review of the Landscaping Plan for planting two Coast Live Oak trees (Quercus
agrifolia) on the vacant property at 301 Spruce Street. The submittal of a Landscaping Plan
(as part of new development proposals on the site) was required as a Condition of Approval
by the Historical Advisory Board under Resolution HAB 01-08, which approved the removal
of one Coast Live Oak tree in 2001, The site is located within an R-4 Neighborhood
Residential District.
Ms. Altschuler gave a brief history of the project. In 1988, the previous owner damaged an
Oak tree through extensive trimming. The owners were required to preserve the tree despite
it being severely pruned. In 2001 the tree showed signs of deteriorating health, and the
Board approved a new owner's request to remove the damaged tree in order to allow a
proposed residential development, with the condition that two new oak trees be planted on
the property. The Board also required the submittal of a landscaping plan for review and
approval by the Board when new construction is proposed on the site. The Board's approval
was subsequently appealed to the City Council, where the Board's decision was upheld upon
the Council's finding that there was no merit to the appeal.
The applicants have secured the services of a Landscape Architect as required by the Board
in 2001 to prepare a landscaping plan and recommendations for the location of the two new
trees. The applicants have also secured services of a certified arborist who has provided
recommendations for protecting the existing trees during construction.
Board member Tilos opened the floor for public comment.
Patrick Lynch, 305 Spruce St., spoke in opposition of this project. He has several issues with
this application. He stated that the Board should be aware that the conditions contained in
CA-01-08 have not been complied with and his requests to the City for enforcement have
been ignored. In 2002 a grading permit was issued for the development project at the site
without requiring replacement trees. He is concerned with the recent changes to Alameda's
Historical Preservation Ordinance that allows Oak Trees with a trunk diameters less than 10""
to be removed without a Certificate of Approval. The proposed replacement trees will not
likely have trunk diameters of this size for 10 to 20 years, and could be removed at the end of
the period required for the landscape maintenance agreement. He therefore requests that the
replacement trees have a diameter greater that 10"" at 4,5 ft. above the ground. He also
disagrees with staff's decision that this project is categorically exempt from the CEQA
guidelines. The tree removal together with the proposed single-family home project may
cumulatively cause additional and substantial adverse change in the condition of the
remaining oak trees.
Ms. Altschuler addressed Mr. Lynch's concerns as followed:
Minutes of April 7, 2005
Regular Historical Advisory Board Meeting
3",HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2005-04-07.pdf
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard,2005-04-07,4,"1. Mr. Lynch's concern with the issuance of the grading permit does not fall under the
prevue of the Historical Advisory Board.
2. To resolve Mr. Lynch's concern regarding the size of the trunk diameters of the
replacement trees, the Board can extend the landscaping maintenance agreement to five years
and require the replacement tree to be larger than 10"" diameter.
3. His issue with staff's decision that this project is exempt from CEQA guidelines do not
fall under the prevue of this Board and should be addressed during the design review process.
4. According to city records, the Certificate of Approval CA01-08 was valid on the day the
tree was removed. The Board approved the request with the condition that two new oak trees
be planted on the property. The Board also required the submittal of a landscaping plan for
review and approval when new construction is proposed. The current owners have submitted
a proposal to construct a single-family residence on the site. A landscaping plan for the
planning of two new Oak trees has been prepared in conformance with Resolution HAB-01-
08. The plans for the new construction are currently under review by Design Review staff.
Conditions of approval for the Design Review will require protection of the existing trees per
the arborist and landscape architect's recommendations, as well as the recordation of a
Landscape Maintenance Agreement to ensure maintenance of the oak trees on the property.
Staff understands that Mr. Lynch has enjoyed living next to a vacant lot, but the owner is
entitled to develop his lot.
Ms. Altschuler advised the Board that the decision before this Board tonight is to approve the
location of the replacement trees as stated in the Landscaping Maintenance plan.
Board member Tilos opened the floor to Board discussion.
Board member Miller is in favor of extending the Landscaping Plan to 5 years. He is also in
favor of requiring the replacement trees to be bigger than a 10"" diameter.
The Certified Arborist, Chris Bowen was present. He suggested that the replacement trees be
24"" box, which would be close to 8 ft tall when planted. He feels this would improve the
property value.
M/S to approve the Landscaping Maintenance Plan with the following revisions: (1) Change
the replacement trees from two 10-gallon trees to two 24"" box trees. (2) Extend the
Landscape Maintenance Agreement from 3 to 5 years.
REPORTS
3. Consideration and comments on design of proposed 352 space parking structure to be
constructed as part of the rehabilitation of the Alameda Theatre and construction of a new
Cineplex. The parking structure would be built at 1416 Oak Street within the CC,
Community Commercial District. (continued from 2-3-05mtg.)
Minutes of April 7, 2005
Regular Historical Advisory Board Meeting
4",HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2005-04-07.pdf
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard,2005-04-07,5,"Jennifer Ott, DSD, informed the Board that this project consists of three parts: the
rehabilitation of the Alameda Theatre; the construction of a seven screen, two story Cineplex
with retail at the ground floor; and the construction of a 352 space, 60+ foot high parking
structure. Tonight staff would like the Board to provide comments on the parking structure
and Cineplex.
CINEPLEX:
The Henry Architects Inc, design team gave a presentation on the proposed Cineplex and
proposed parking structure. The presentation included various pictures of the proposed
Cineplex from different views of Central Ave. to address the concern that the Cineplex
would block the view of the Twin Towers Church. Mr. Henry concluded that in order to see
both towers of the church, over half of the upper levels of the new Cineplex would need to be
eliminated.
Another concern Mr. Henry spoke of is the 20 ft. overhang element on Central Ave and Oak
St. Mr. Henry stated that in order to provide a viable Cineplex it is critical to have the
proposed overhang. Without this overhang auditorium #7 would suffer greatly, losing 28
seats and reducing the screen size significantly. This will have a severe impact on the quality
of the presentation and reduce the ability to compete effectively with Jack London Square.
In addition to the severe economic impacts, deletion of the overhang. would be detrimental to
the architecture. The overhang provides a clear separation of stories and materials thus
reducing uninterrupted wall would create.
The last concern Mr. Henry addressed was the corner element. Mr. Henry stated that this
design included a great deal of surface articulation to eliminate the box like effect. Vertical
recesses continuing the line of the columns from the ground level have been added to the
upper sections at the auditoriums along with the horizontal elements to reduce the tallness of
the building. They have also rounded the corner ""tower"" on Oak St. and Central Ave. to
match the curved corners of the historic theater and the Starbuck building on Park St. This
will also reduce the box like effect shown in previous plans and adds more set back to the
corner for better visibility of the church.
Lastly Mr. Henry briefly went over the three different ideas for the color of the proposed
Cineplex.
Boardmember Lynch stated she was not in favor of the proposed sign on the new Cineplex.
Mr. Henry responded by stating he had no problems eliminating the proposed sign.
Boardmember Tilos opened the floor to public comment.
Minutes of April 7, 2005
Regular Historical Advisory Board Meeting
5",HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2005-04-07.pdf
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard,2005-04-07,6,"Ann Rutter stated she likes the new proposed design. She would like to see the Oak St.
elevation. She feels this project has been forced on the community. She would like to see
more handicap parking spaces closer to the elevators for easier wheelchair access.
David Baker, 939 Taylor Ave., feels that the new proposal is not compatible with the
historical qualities of Alameda. He stated that the art deco is missing.
Richard Knight, 1372 Versailles Ave., feels that the primary goal of this project is for the
Historic Alameda Theatre to be back in operation. He is concerned with what would happen
if this Cineplex went out of business in the future.
John Sargent, 3105 El Paseo, stated he was concerned when he saw the proposed design in
the Alameda Sun. He feels that the parking lot should be located on the corner of Oak St.
and Santa Clara Ave. The parking garage should include more art deco style and not look so
much like a parking garage. He stated that housing should be included on the upper two
stories of the parking garage.
Scott Brady, AAPS, feels that in general the design is good. He feels that the vertical
elements should be stressed more. The proposed design has impressions of columns, but
does not read very strong. This is a very good start.
Kevin Frederick, 1287 Caroline St., stated that the proposed design still feels to ""boxie""
looking. He stated that he feels that Oak St. is too narrow to support such a huge Theatre and
Parking Garage. He does not currently go to movie theaters. He would prefer to rent a
movie or download from computer. These days modern technology may prevent huge Multi-
plex Theatres to be successful.
Doreen Soto, DSD, responded to some of the comments made tonight as follows:
1. Currently Long's Drugs is not willing to participate in this project. The City has to move
forward with this project.
2. The City has hired the best economist to work on this project. He has determined that
based on the population and demographics, this project will succeed. The parking
structure will attract more business to Park St.
3. The proposed Cineplex is not an addition to the Historic Theatre. She feels the new
Cineplex will compliment the Historic Theatre.
Board member Lynch requested that the Board hold a special meeting to submit comments
on the proposed Cineplex, as she would like more time to review the items submitted tonight.
The Board agreed and instructed Staff to schedule a Special meeting to hear comments on the
Cineplex only. Staff will forward a copy of the PowerPoint presentation to the Board. The
Board will only submit comments on the Parking Structure tonight.
Minutes of April 7, 2005
Regular Historical Advisory Board Meeting
6",HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2005-04-07.pdf
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard,2005-04-07,7,"PARKING STRUCTURE:
Mr. Michael Stanton, architect, gave a brief summary of what was presented to the Planning
Board on March 28, 2005. Mr. Stanton informed the HAB of the comments they received
from the Planning Board. The Planning Board preferred the lighter color brick, simplify the
lines (on top) of Cineplex behind Longs, more lighting on the disabled bike access of parking
garage, stair tower should either be all open or have the same openings as the parking garage,
eliminate the on-street parking on Oak St. to extend the sidewalk and add street trees.
Board member Tilos opened the floor to Public comment.
Don Cunningham, Twin Towers Church, is in favor of the lighting and the color. He stated
that Twin Towers was built long before automobiles were in use. Not in favor of losing the
on-street parking on Oak St. He is concerned with the travel pattern.
Chuck Millar, 2829 San Jose Ave., stated that for safety reasons the on-street parking should
be eliminated. All construction should fit in to the surrounding area. He would like to know
what the HAB's role in this project is?
In response to Mr. Millar question, Ms. Altschuler stated, there are three items that require
approval from the HAB. First, Certificate of Approval for the structural alterations relating
to the seismic strengthening of the front façade, second, the new openings between the
theatre and the new Cineplex, and third, the new opening for the concession stand.
The Planning Board will give final design approval for the Cineplex and Parking Garage.
Staff is just asking for comments from the HAB.
Kevin Frederick, 1287 Caroline St., is not in favor of the exterior design He feels it is out of
place with surrounding buildings.
Don Sargent, is not in favor of façade. He feels the open banks can be treated architecturally.
He feels that it might be necessary to take away the on-street parking on the opposite side of
the street as well.
Richard Knight is not in favor of design. He feels there are no historical elements. Is not
compatible with surrounding area.
Ann Rutter commended Michael Stanton for his work on this project. She would like to see
free parking on Sundays. She is in favor of the lighting design, but would like to see more
art deco.
Minutes of April 7, 2005
Regular Historical Advisory Board Meeting
7",HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2005-04-07.pdf
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard,2005-04-07,8,"Scott Brady, AAPS, feels the Oak St. façade looks to jumbled. The lower level does not tie
in with the upper levels. Stair tower should have more glazing. Arches should be increased.
He is in favor of the buff colored brick. More attention should be placed on the blank wall
facing Long's
Rob Ratto, PSBA, is in favor of project. He likes the idea of a mural on the blank wall facing
Long's He likes the new proposed design for the Cineplex. The loss of on-street parking
spaces will make it more pedestrian friendly. There will be metered parking spaces in the
parking garage. Five-hour time limit Monday - Saturday, 9 am - 5 pm, free on Sundays. He
stated that this project has limited funds. There will have to be some compromises. It is hard
to hide the fact that this is a parking garage.
M/S (Miller, Lynch) to extend the meeting to 10:30 pm. 3-0-2.
Ayes: 3; Noes: 0; Absent: 2: Motion carries.
Boardmember Tilos closed floor for public comment and opened Board discussion.
Boardmember Miller is in favor of the poster boxes because he feels that there will be a
maintenance issue with the planting of vines. He is in favor of the glazing on the tower, and
is not in favor of the canopy.
Boardmember Lynch does not feel this design is compatible but understands this project
needs to move forward. She is in favor of the buff color and prefers the posters to the vines.
She likes the idea of free parking on Sundays and is in favor of the mural.
Boardmember Tilos stated that the columns above the main entrance do not blend together.
He is in favor of the design for the Cineplex.
M/S (Lynch, Miller) to continue only the Cineplex portion of this item for comments to a
Special Meeting. (date to be announced.) 3-0-2.
Ayes: 3; Noes: 0; Absent: 2: Motion carries.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS:
Boardmember Lynch stated that representatives from Alameda Point will be meeting with
AAPS on April 19, 2005 to address the Historic Preservation concerns. Boardmember Lynch
would like to be a representative for the Historical Advisory Board if a committee is formed.
Staff took note of this request.
Minutes of April 7, 2005
Regular Historical Advisory Board Meeting
8",HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2005-04-07.pdf
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard,2005-04-07,9,"STAFF COMMUNICATION:
Ms. Altschuler introduced Doug Garrison, Planner III. There will also be another new
planner starting on Monday, April 11, 2005.
ADJOURNMENT:
M/S (Miller, Lynch) to adjourn meeting at 10:38 pm.
Respectfully Submitted by:
Jerry Cormack,
Interim Planning & Building Director
G:PLANNINGHHAB\AGENMIN\Agemin.05\4-7-05 MINUTES_HAB.doc
Minutes of April 7, 2005
Regular Historical Advisory Board Meeting
9",HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2005-04-07.pdf